ELISA Proficiency
Testing Program - Frequently Asked Questions
The core purpose of this program is to identify laboratories proficient
in performing ELISA testing of milk samples.
This
program will consist of a monthly set of 'Samples Unknown' that will
be distributed
to participating
laboratories for analysis and data submission.
What
is the purpose and future of the QCS proficiency test program?
This
proficiency testing program is intended to provide a measure of consistency
and accuracy among laboratories and their technicians. This
program may be subject to revision as data are accumulated.
Quality
Certification
Services Inc. will publish a list of qualified laboratories that
pass both qualitative and quantitative guidelines. This list will include
laboratory name, technician name, and assays for which the laboratory
demonstrated proficiency. Laboratories may elect to report results
less frequently to internally assess their performance, but will not
be listed as certified until monthly reporting of analysis is complete.
Who
can participate in the QCS ELISA Proficiency Program?
This
program is open to any laboratory analyzing milk samples using ELISA.
Participation in this program is voluntary and is not limited by:
test kit manufacturer, geographic location, or size. Participating
laboratories
do not need
to be affiliated with a DHI organization or any other government
entity.
Participation
in other certification programs offered by Quality Certification
Services Inc. or other entities is not required to join the ELISA Proficiency
Program.
Why develop a proficiency program beyond that offered by the USDA?
While
the USDA annual proficiency program is considered the primary program
for laboratory accreditation, especially for National and
State Voluntary Control Programs, many in DHI feel that the annual
frequency of this program is
not sufficient.
The
QCS ELISA Proficiency Program is being developed to:
- provide
a high assurance of accuracy to dairy producers who use results for
management decisions including treatment and culling.
- potentially
satisfy the QC requirements of DHI and industry partners who rely
on data for genetic and management research.
- either substitute
or suffice for the accreditation provided by USDA as this program
surpasses the current annual program.
Why
evaluate laboratory technician performance in the proficiency program?
The
variability associated with laboratory technician running ELISA is
expected to be larger than the laboratory technician variation
associated with traditional component analysis of milk.
Since other programs do evaluate technician performance,
a current estimate of variability is not available. The data
gathered through this proficiency
program will be used
to assess the magnitude and significance of this variation.
What are the costs for the QCS proficiency program?
The costs are divided into two categories.
-
The
first category is for administration, data collection and analysis.
The annual cost
for this category is $360
per laboratory, which includes one technician,
and $120 for each additional technician. These fees are billed by Quality
Certification Services Inc. on an annual basis. Laboratories entering
the program during the calendar year will be billed on a prorated basis.
-
The
second category is the cost for the monthly 'Samples
Unknown.' The annual
cost for this category is $420
and is paid directly to the Samples
Unknown Supplier. Each set of 'Samples Unknown'
will be able to accommodate up to three laboratory
technicians. If required,
individual
sets of Samples Unknown will cost $35.
Do all technicians have to be enrolled in the proficiency program?
The
current proficiency program is voluntary in all aspects. Most laboratories
have a primary ELISA technician who will be backed up by additional
technician(s)
on certain occasions.
Laboratories are encouraged to have all technicians
performing ELISA enrolled in the program. It is however, the responsibility
of the laboratory manager to ensure the daily accuracy
and consistency
of
ELISA testing. The monthly 'Samples Unknown' should provide enough
milk for up to three laboratory technicians.
How
should the monthly 'Samples Unknown' be analyzed?
The
'Samples Unknown' should be tested according the standard procedures
used by the laboratory for commercial samples. As a general
rule, treat the 'Samples Unknown' as commercial samples and
report the raw data that
would have been used for calculating the ELISA
scores and interpretation reported to veterinarians and producers.
The Samples
Unknown contain 10 duplicate milk samples so there is no need to
rerun 'positive' samples.
The
unknown samples are are sent to the laboratories on the Monday of
the third full week of each month. Laboratories have until the last
business
day of the each month to analyze and report the results to QCS. This
protocol should allow adequate time for those laboratories with less
frequent ELISA testing to incorporate the unknowns analysis into
routine commercial sample analysis. Please refer to the current calendar
for exact sample shipping dates and reporting deadlines.
A
monthly proficiency programs seems excessive - why the need?
The
current frequency was chosen to provide similar
measures of accuracy and consistency as demonstrated
for traditional milk component analysis in
DHI. Dairy producers and allied industry partners
have a high expectation of accuracy that may not
be offered by an annual monitoring program. Moreover,
the proficiency program will benefit
from
the large
amount of data
that will be accumulated to evaluate sources
of variability.
Commercial
Volume (Annual Number Samples) |
Cost/Sample
for Program Participation |
Notes |
1,000 |
$2.94 |
Estimate
based on two technicians-cost would be less
with only one ELISA technician |
5,000 |
$0.59 |
|
10,000 |
$0.29 |
|
20,000 |
$0.15 |
|
40,000 |
$0.07 |
|
80,000 |
$0.04 |
|
The
table above provides an estimate of the per sample
costs of the program to certify two technicians for
laboratories with various commercial testing volumes.
The calculations assume $2.50 to run a single well
for ELISA, 1.5 wells per unknown sample, and 4 standards.
When run with commercial samples however, the actual
costs associated with labor and standards would be
diluted.
|