MINUTES
COUNCIL
ON DAIRY CATTLE BREEDING
St.
Louis Renaissance Hotel
St.
Louis, MO
March
14, 2002
ROLL
CALL
Eric
Metzger, AJCA
Corey Geiger, Hoards
Tom
Lawlor, Holstein Assn
Marlin Hoff, Holstein Assn
Dave
Kendall, Milking Shorthorn/Brn Swiss
Ryan Starkenburg, Holstein Assn.
Michael
Rector, QCS
Duane Norman, ARS/USDA
David
Selner, ReQuest
John Fiscalini, CDHIA
Bill
VerBoort, CDHIA
Jody Pinter, AgSource
Greg
Marrs, NDHIA
Susan Lee, NDHIA
Harlan
Borman, NDHIA
Jere High, QCS
John
Clay, DRMS
Paul Miller, NDHIA
Mike
Schutz, Purdue Univ/S-284
Michael Tomaszewski, TDHIA
Ken l.
Crandall, DHI-Provo
Bill Ramsey, NAAB
Denny
Funk, ABS Global
Doug Blair, Alta Genetics
Kent
Weigel, UW/NAAB
Gordon Doak, NAAB
APPROVAL
OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
Funk
moved with second from Hoff to approve the October 2, 2001 minutes as
distributed. Motion passed
unanimously.
DESIGNATED
REPRESENTATIVES
Voting
representatives for the various groups are as follows:
AI - Doug Blair, Denny Funk, Bill Ramsey
Dairy Record Providers - Paul Miller, Harold Borman and John
Fiscalini
PDCA - David Kendall, Marlin Hoff and Tom Lawlor
INTRODUCTIONS
Everyone
present at the meeting introduced themselves and indicated organization
affiliation.
Chairman
Miller made a few comments discussing changes taking place within the industry
including fewer government regulations, fewer organizations and questioning
whether making decisions in an informal manner is the best approach. He
indicated that the bylaws and memorandum of understanding likely need to be
reviewed. The current memorandum of understanding supercedes all old MOUs, so
that relationships between organizations may need to be reviewed. He suggested
the three objectives outlined in Article I of the bylaws should be reviewed to
insure accuracy.
He
suggested that many in the dairy industry see the Council as a final decision
maker for a number of issues and this must be recognized by the members of the
Council.
QCS
REPORT
Michael
Rector presented the Quality Certification Services report which included a
table of the audit schedules for 2002 for the various areas
audited.
AUDIT
REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
Bill
VerBoort gave the Audit Review Committee report. He reported that the Committee
denied the FSAC recommendations to suspend the requirement that all electronic
meters be checked for calibration on an annual basis until methods other than
water tests can be developed. They recommended that the accuracy of meters must
be verified whenever in doubt and at least once a year using an approved method.
Further, fixed in-place electronic meters must have records of accuracy
verification on file at the dairy and at the office of the DHIA service
affiliate. Checks of meter performance and accuracy produced by the milking
system software or by DHIA software can be used to verify the accuracy of these
meters.
Funk
moved with second from Borman to approve all changes that are recommended by the
Committee to this point. Motion passed unanimously.
Borman
moved with second from Fiscalini to accept the time table for handling the
Advisory Committee recommendations so they can become effective the first of the
following year. Motion passed unanimously.
UNIFORM
OPERATING PROCEDURES
Miller
reported that NDHIA approved at their annual meeting, revisions to the National
Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures. A copy was
available for review by the Council.
It was
questioned how the Uniform Operating Procedures apply to cooperators that are
not members of the National DHIA. It was indicated that the Council uses these
as a part of quality certification and that there is ample opportunity for input
from other organizations who are not members of NDHIA.
VerBoort
suggested that appendixes be made to the Uniform Operating Procedures that
define things such as NDHIA tolerances, etc.
It was
also reported that Bruce Dokkebakken of QCS, will be the new Chairman of the
Audit Review Committee.
INCLUSION
OF PERCENT SHIPPED IN NON-OS RECORDS
Kendall
questioned why “percent shipped” was not included in non-owner/sampler records
for genetic evaluations. It was indicated that originally owner/sampler records
had more stringent standards than official supervised records. Kendall indicated
that there are records not getting into the system, even though they have
electronic daily weights.
It was
subsequently moved by Kendall with second from Hoff to encourage USDA to develop
methods to measure the quality of milk records with the goal of weighting these
records more appropriately in genetic evaluation program. Motion passed
unanimously.
PROCEDURES
TO RELEASE GENETIC EVALUATIONS WHEN PROBLEMS OCCUR
Dr.
Norman provided background on problems encountered for the February 2002 genetic
evaluations. It was generally agreed that the Interbull Steering Committee needs
to review the Interbull data to insure correctness before it is released to the
participating genetic evaluation agencies. Genetic evaluation units would then
be under fewer constraints to meet release and publication deadlines. There was
consensus that there should be a subcommittee of the Steering Committee to
review the correctness of Interbull data.
As far
as the in-country review of evaluations, it was suggested that Dr. Powell has a
small advisory group he works with on these problems. If there is someone who
wants to be on this list, they should contact Dr. Powell.
FREQUENCY
OF EVALUATIONS
At the
request of NAAB, Dr. Norman and his staff prepared a proposal to change the
frequency of evaluations from four times per year to three times per year, plus
three interim unofficial evaluations. PDCA indicated they did not have a problem
with three official evaluations per year, but they were concerned about interim
evaluations and the effect on cow evaluations. It was expressed that if we did
go to three official, three unofficial evaluations, that within three years we
would have six unofficial evaluations.
It was
moved by Blair with second from Funk that NAAB proposes there be official
evaluations released three times per year; unofficial interim evaluations would
be calculated between each official evaluation for bulls with a significant
increase in information and criteria to determine which bulls would be evaluated
in the interim evaluations will be determined after further consultation with
USDA-AIPL. The motion was defeated five to four.
PATENT
ISSUES
It was
reported that Canada should know by the end of March the results of their
challenge of the test day patent in Canada. The EU patent will be issued
shortly, if it hasn’t been already. It was indicated that there is consideration
in Europe of challenging the patent. Germany requested ICAR to help fund its
challenge. A reply from Dr. Paul Miller indicated support for this project for
ICAR so long as they support any challenges in countries other than just the
EU.
It was
reported that Dairy One who has a license to the patent is moving along very
slowly with regard to its use and implementation.
At the
last meeting it was recommended that members of the Council not send data to
Cornell because of issues with the test day patent. Reports from the DRPCs
present suggests there is very little information going to Cornell and if it is
going, it is being done on a request basis only.
AIPL
FUNDING
In the
government’s FY02 budget, the Council was successful on getting an additional
$600,000 for the AIPL budget. However in the President’s FY03 budget, all items
that were included in FY02 the budget called add-ons were dropped. Doak reported
that he and Miller and Meyer would be going to Washington in April to work with
Congressional leaders to reinstate the funding for AIPL.
AIPL
REPORT
Dr.
Norman indicated that AIPL has a new Website and was seeking comments concerning
the new look for the Website. A number of abstracts submitted by AIPL staff were
available for the Council’s review.
BROWN
SWISS PTI FORMULA
Materials
were available for the Council’s review concerning a change in the PTI formula
for the Brown Swiss Association which was implemented in the February 2002
genetic evaluations.
ANIMAL
MODEL REVIEW
A
letter from Linda Hordorff was distributed to the Council for their review. She
indicated that the Board of Directors of HAUSA recommended that the industry in
cooperation with the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding review the current animal
model. Following discussion, it was agreed that this is an appropriate request
and Dr. Norman will follow up.
AMERICAN
ID
Kendall
reported that Dr. John Weimer of USDA-APHIS stated the proposed rule for the
animal identification number should be published shortly with comments due by
October/November.
ELECTION
OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
As
this is the annual meeting for the Council, the following voting directors were
elected by the respective groups:
Dairy Record Providers - John Miscalling, Paul Miller, Harlan
Barman
AI - Doug Blair, Denny Funk, John Ramsey
PDCA - John Meyer, Marlin Hoff, Dave Kendall
The
Council bylaws allow that the Chairmanship for the Council rotates between the
three groups. PDCA has responsibility for Chairmanship for this next year. John
Meyer will serve as Chairman of the Council on Dairy Cattle
Breeding.
NEXT
MEETING
The
next meeting of the Council will be either October 29 or 30 with the location to
be announced. There was consensus to start the meeting at 8:00 a.m. and conclude
by 1:00 p.m. that same day.
ADJOURNMENT
With
no further business to come before the meeting, the meeting was
adjourned.
Respectfully
submitted:
_______________________________________
Dr.
Gordon A. Doak, Ph.D.
Recording
Secretary
Z:\Council on Dairy Cattle
Breeding\Minutes\Mins3-14-02-St.
Louis.doc