Minutes of the

Processing Center Advisory Committee Conference Call

August 19, 2002

 

The sixth meeting of the Processing Center Advisory Committee was held via conference call at noon EST.  Ken Crandall, DHI-Provo, chaired the meeting and the following persons attended as participants:

 


Kathy Hagin, AgriTech Analytics

Jody Pinter, AgSource Cooperative / CRI

John Clay, DRMS

Gary Griffin, DRMS

Mary Margaret Steele, DRMS

Paul Miller, National DHIA

Michael Rector, QCS

Jerry Steurnagel, QCS

 

The Minutes of the September 24, 2001 meeting were approved with one amendment to the title line.

 

During the reading of the Minutes, Jerry Steuernagel confirmed that there were no significant problems with the Standard Transfer Formats or Test Herd programs.  He also confirmed that AIPL was flagging Test Herd variables that were outside of the established ranges.

 

Ken Crandall noted that there had been no letter sent to the processing centers requesting that the formulas for energy corrected milk (ECM) and cheese yield (CY) be revised to use true protein values instead of crude protein values.  However, AgriTech Analytics, AgSource Cooperative / CRI, and DHI-Provo confirmed that they had already made the change and DRMS said they would make the change in the near future.

 

Jerry Steuernagel questioned the need for a third identification field for barn name entry.  AgSource Cooperative / CRI confirmed that they needed three fields for identification.  The rest of the Committee agreed that two identification fields were adequate for their needs but that some rewording of the core variable definitions may clarify the issue.  Jerry agreed to draft a revision.

 

Michael Rector relayed questions regarding the marking of herds with non-certified meters and each processing center represented confirmed that they had a place to code records in this manner.

 

Michael also expressed the need for accessing field service data directly from the processing centers.  The Committee agreed to try and accommodate the request and Michael agreed to send a detailed list of data needed to each processing center.

 

The Committee discussed the proposed AIPL contract for young stock, reproductive, and health data.  Jody Pinter agreed to follow up on issues language to decrease the possibility of patent problems.

 

Jody Pinter questioned the necessity of maintaining the Cow and Herd Profiles and Paul Miller confirmed that the profiles were still a requirement in the Uniform Data Collection Procedures.  The Committee recommended that the UDCP be revised to exclude the profiles.

 

Michael Rector discussed plans for combining the Field Service and Laboratory Advisory Committee meetings and asked the Committee if they would like to be included also.  The Committee agreed that they sometimes needed face-to-face contact with AIPL personnel and declined the offer to participate in a multi-committee meeting.  They also noted that most other issues can be resolved via conference calls.

 

The Committee did not set a date or location for the next meeting and the meeting was adjourned.

 

 

                                                                                                Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                                                Michael Rector

                                                                                                QCS President

top of page